Problems of Homemade Protection of Russian Tanks: Damaged Transmissions and Shortage of Reactive Armor

Problems of Homemade Protection of Russian Tanks: Damaged Transmissions and Shortage of Reactive Armor
Russian T-72B3 with a two-story mangal. Photo from open sources
News

Russian tank crews share that improvised overhead cages — known as “tsar-mangals” — overload the transmission and cause failures. They also report a severe shortage of explosive reactive armor (ERA).

Units are forced to replace missing blocks with improvised substitutes.

Tank historian Andriy Tarasenko published fragments of an interview with a member of a Russian tank crew.

According to the tanker, the “tsar-mangals” damage transmissions, sometimes after just a few kilometers of driving.

Illustrative image of a Russian tank with handmade protective structures

Even more problems arise when crews mount cages directly on the turret — in those cases, turret rotation drives fail and backup manual rotation becomes impossible.

“The chassis survives, but the transmission and side gearboxes don’t. In another company, they made a ‘tsar-mangal’ out of cables. It didn’t even make it 10 km before one of the side gearboxes failed. The load on the components is very high, and they fail much faster. And if you mount the mangal on the turret instead of the hull, the turret drives burn out — you can forget about manual rotation,” he said.

He also notes a major shortage of reactive armor blocks, especially the modern Relikt system, which units replace with improvised versions.

“Oh… with the reactive armor — a complete mess. On older vehicles, it was a bit easier, although there was already a shortage of blocks, then of plastic explosives. That didn’t stop me: we reinforced the gunner’s side with two layers, welded a second layer onto the turret, and installed the screens. But on the BVMs… all those Relikts they show apparently exist only in Kremlin cartoons. On the turret cheeks, there’s a homemade version from garage workshops — sheet metal shaped like factory plating with an explosive insert from the UR-77 mine-clearing line charge. It works about 50/50 at a 45° angle,” the tanker complained.

In addition, he shared that while tanks arrive from the factory with a “good configuration,” repair battalions have to buy spare parts with their own funds when components fail.

Homemade reactive armor

In June 2024, Russian forces started producing improvised reactive armor blocks in field workshops.

In garage conditions, they pack explosives from the UR-77 mine-clearing charge into homemade containers.

The process of manufacturing an improvised reactive armor block. Photo credits: t.me/btvt2019

These containers are similar in dimensions to the 4S20 blocks used in the Kontakt-1 reactive armor system.

The explosive mixture extracted from the mine-clearing charge is similar to what is used in Kontakt-1. However, for reactive armor, precise matching is critical, as it determines activation on impact. As a result, improvised blocks often fail to activate, according to the Russian tanker.

Share this post:

SUPPORT MILITARNYI

PrivatBank ( Bank card )
5169 3351 0164 7408
Bank Account in UAH (IBAN)
UA043052990000026007015028783
ETH
0x6db6D0E7acCa3a5b5b09c461Ae480DF9A928d0a2
BTC
bc1qv58uev602j2twgxdtyv4z0mvly44ezq788kwsd
USDT
TMKUjnNbCN4Bv6Vvtyh7e3mnyz5QB9nu6V
Popular
Button Text